Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HENRYK URBAN AND RYSZARD URBAN v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08
• EGMR, 06.12.2012 - 23614/08
• EGMR - 23614/08 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

  CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  It may be indicated here that in attempting to define more closely a certain minimum period which would guarantee professional stability the European Court of Human Rights found three years to be sufficient (judgment of the ECHR of 28 June 1984 in the case of Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, nos. 7819/77 and 7878/77, and the judgment of the ECHR of 22 October 1984 in the case of Sramek v. Austria, no. 8790/79).

  The Court recalls that in determining whether a body can be considered as "independent" - notably of the executive and of the parties to the case - regard must be had, inter alia, to the manner of appointment of its members and the duration of their term of office, the existence of guarantees against outside pressures and the question whether the body presents an appearance of independence (see Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 78, Series A no. 80; Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 65, Reports 1998-IV; Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, § 38, ECHR 2005-II; and Luka v. Romania, no. 34197/02, § 37, 21 July 2009).

• EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74

  MARCKX v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  The same considerations apply where a constitutional court annuls domestic legislation as being unconstitutional (see Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 58, Series A no. 31).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

  ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  However, it is only exceptionally that a violation, by its very nature, does not leave any real choice as to the measures required to remedy it (see, Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II).

 
• EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 33916/96

  WALDEN v. LIECHTENSTEIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  Moreover, it has also been accepted, in view of the principle of legal certainty, that a constitutional court may set a time-limit for the legislator to enact new legislation with the effect that an unconstitutional provision remains applicable for a transitional period (see Walden v. Liechtenstein (dec.), no. 33916/96, 16 March 2000).
• EGMR, 22.10.1984 - 8790/79

  Sramek ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  It may be indicated here that in attempting to define more closely a certain minimum period which would guarantee professional stability the European Court of Human Rights found three years to be sufficient (judgment of the ECHR of 28 June 1984 in the case of Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, nos. 7819/77 and 7878/77, and the judgment of the ECHR of 22 October 1984 in the case of Sramek v. Austria, no. 8790/79).
• EGMR, 01.10.1982 - 8692/79

  PIERSACK v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  What is at stake is the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public (see, amongst many other authorities, Piersack v. Belgium, 1 October 1982, § 30, Series A no. 53, and Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 98, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  Although the notion of the separation of powers between the political organs of government and the judiciary has assumed growing importance in the Court's case-law (see Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV), neither Article 6 nor any other provision of the Convention requires States to comply with any theoretical constitutional concepts regarding the permissible limits of the powers' interaction (see Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI, and Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411/01, § 59, ECHR 2006-XIII).
• EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80

  BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  It should be indicated here that the Strasbourg case-law underlines precisely that if judges or persons exercising judicial powers are not appointed for life, they could be appointed for a certain term of office, and that they must benefit from a certain stability and must not be dependent on any authority (judgment of the ECHR of 23 October 1985 in the case of Benthem v. the Netherlands, no. 8848/80).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 36455/02

  GUROV v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  The Court adopted a similar stance in cases against other Contracting Parties where the finding of a breach of Article 6 was related to the lack of independence or impartiality of the domestic courts (see, San Leonard Band Club v. Malta, no. 77562/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-IX, and Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 43, 11 July 2006).
• EKMR, 19.03.1981 - 7878/77

  FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 23614/08

  It may be indicated here that in attempting to define more closely a certain minimum period which would guarantee professional stability the European Court of Human Rights found three years to be sufficient (judgment of the ECHR of 28 June 1984 in the case of Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, nos. 7819/77 and 7878/77, and the judgment of the ECHR of 22 October 1984 in the case of Sramek v. Austria, no. 8790/79).
• EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 141/07

  WEGERA c. POLOGNE

• BVerfG, 18.03.2013 - 1 BvR 2436/11

  Stichtagsregelung für die erbrechtliche Gleichstellung der vor dem 1. Juli 1949 …

  Soweit aber die Rechtslage vor Verkündung des Marckx-Urteils betroffen sei, bestehe keine Veranlassung, sie in Frage zu stellen (EGMR…, Urteil vom 29. November 1991, a.a.O., Rn. 22; vgl. auch EGMR, Urteil vom 30. November 2010 - 23614/08 -, Urban u.a./Polen;… Leipold, ZEV 2009, S. 488 ).

  Ob ein Mitgliedstaat in Umsetzung seiner Pflicht zur Herstellung eines konventionsgemäßen Zustandes von einer weitergehenden Rückwirkung nur - oder jedenfalls - dann absehen kann, wenn die zuständigen Organe hierbei willkürlich handelten (vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 30. November 2010 - 23614/08 -, Urban u.a./Polen, Rn. 65;… Breuer, in: Karpenstein/Mayer, EMRK, 2012, Art. 46 Rn. 37), bleibt für den vorliegenden Fall jedoch ohne Belang, da von Willkür ersichtlich nicht ausgegangen werden kann.

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 02.03.2023 - C-718/21

  Generalanwalt Rantos bezweifelt, dass das Verfahren, mit dem die KRS ihre …

  81 Die einschlägige Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs steht im Einklang mit der Rechtsprechung des EGMR, wonach im Wesentlichen die Ernennung von Richtern durch Behörden, die der Exekutive angehören, keine begründeten Zweifel an der Unabhängigkeit dieser Richter aufwirft, sofern die Richter nach ihrer Ernennung vor Einflussnahme und Druck bei der Entscheidungsfindung geschützt sind (vgl. u. a. EGMR, 30. November 2010, Henryk Urban und Ryszard Urban/Polen, CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD002361408, § 49).